But when the professors and practitioners do not maintain an open mind they become a broken record repeating the same errors over and over again. This is why humanity faltered with the concept of eugenics and we would hear no argument against it because we were so certain of the truth. That is until the rivers of blood reached our door steps and we had to step in it to leave our homes. Had we, but once listened to reason, so many would have lived. The progressives were for eugenics and the right was opposed on moral grounds. The left believed they were the instrument of nature perfecting man for the future by making him stronger and they called the right who opposed them stupid and crazy. Nothing has changed in the intervening years.
The ideology of the left began during the French Revolution with the Jacobins and it is here that we see that their ideology of blood began with the liberal use of the guillotine. So many were beheaded that the executions became passé and the French people yawned. The French Revolution also was unique in their premise that man could be completely trusted as opposed to the American ideal that all men were fallible and therefore complete trust could not exist. Put simply, the French said trust everyone and the Americans said trust, but verify because only God deserved complete trust. In essence, the French believed in man and America put her faith in the Almighty and this is why today, the left adores men in power as the ultimate end of their aims.
This is also why the left believes that the ends justify the means. So what if tens of millions must be exterminated in order to bring about their version of utopia? During the Soviet era, the State could do no wrong. All actions were moral so long as the State benefitted. However, this concept became more liberal during the time of Lenin and the standard became any action was acceptable so long as it did not harm the State. Rape, murder, the poisoning of children, genocide, literally any action was just fine as long as the action did no harm to the government. This is the same reasoning that today’s left uses when it delivers a beat down to a political opponents, accuses others of being racist, declares someone on the right to be insane, or to justify leaking top secret information or outing covert agents overseas so that they can be killed.
During the 1960’s the SDS admitted to an undercover FBI agent that after the left took over the governing of America they would likely execute about 25 million people in order to secure their political position. Today, Bill Ayers and his wife, Bernadine Dorn, are both unrepentant and sorry that they did not do more to murder and bomb the American people. People like them are at the highest levels of government, including the White House. Communists are in charge of industry, and the unions are calling the shots on healthcare and bail outs in order to offload their own unmanageable debts. All of this adds up to an excellent reason to get rid of God and Judeo Christian ethics. Of course in order to do that, they also have to infiltrate and pervert these religions. This is why you get a Jeremiah Wright and the concept of social justice. Can’t have any sense of morality or decency overriding the leftist agenda when they return to letting the blood flow can we?
All of this has happened before and all of this will happen again unless and until the left’s ideology is destroyed. Not modified, not neutered, but destroyed. Marxism, socialism, progressivism, and the left are all labels for the same thing: the total destruction of the existing society. This is why I term these vermin and their ideology societal acids. They destroy the culture, the morality, and the infrastructure of the nation in order to create a vacuum which will then bring about their beloved bloodletting. If you don’t believe that then please explain to me why the Soviets needed 28,000 gulags? Why did Joe Stalin murder 27 million in the Ukraine by starvation? Why was someone who was opposed ideologically to the Soviet system deemed insane and either shipped off to an insane asylum or a gulag? Why did Mao butcher 80 million in China? Why did the Khmer Rouge butcher 2 million in the killing fields? Why was the left responsible for the slaughter of more than 100 million in the last century? Somehow, I believe that I will never get a reasoned answer to those questions.
Does my criticism of the leftist love of bloodshed define me as a pacifist? Not at all, I very much believe in the use of violence and bloodshed, but only in the cause of protecting, defending, and preserving the rights and freedoms of myself and others. The left uses bloodshed and violence to enforce their will upon others. Therefore, I cite this ideology as an enemy of freedom and free will. Of course, this also explains why the left is so enamored of Islam as they both share the same methods of governance and a love of bloodshed for the sake of dominance. Was it not the left who authorized the building of a Mosque at ground zero? I believe that their reasoning was not that they are dishonoring the slain, but embracing cultural differences. Smooth.
I do not despise these people because I do not know them. It is because I know them that I despise them. But even my dislike for these vermin is a pale flame compared to the burning hatred of those who once believed in their cause, but found out who they really are and what they really want and so became a conservative. Evil exists because man exists and it is man who carries within his soul the seeds of both good and evil. This is why a people must be stripped of their morality before harsh changes can come about. When your moral compass is spinning you cannot tell right from wrong, hence 64 million shades of gray when once all we had to worry about is black and white.
There is a reason that there are so many parallels between today’s events and the events leading up to the dominance of the Nazi state. If we can, but disrupt the cycle we have an opportunity for victory over leftist dogma, but we cannot persevere if we cannot recognize the battlefield and the stakes. The battlefield is our communities and the stakes are everything that we hold dear. We must be firm in our opposition and we must not give in to the temptation to compromise. We must stymie their political objectives, oppose their every initiative, and continually smack them in the face with their failures, failed ideology, and history. If we do not, then we betray our founders and our guiding principles.